October 21, 2003
Data Mirroring Advances
Real-time data mirroring is improving, making it faster and cheaper to store huge amounts of critical data at secondary sites, according to IBM, which is unveiling new remote backup products. That's good news on the cost front. But it might also attract notice in Washington, where the physical limitations of mirroring were an issue as federal regulators weighed guidelines on backup data centers for Wall Street firms. as well.
During discussions last year, regulators wanted backup centers to be hundreds of miles outside New York to ensure the markets could reopen quickly after a "regional disaster." The financial industry chafed at codifying a "safe" distance between centers. One of its arguments was that current technology didn't allow reliable real-time mirroring beyond 60 miles, making it untenable for the feds to recommend that facilities be further apart.
Of course, that was a convenient argument for the many financial firms with backup data centers in Manhattan, Brooklyn or nothern New Jersey. A mandate from DC on "geographic diversity" would have meant expensive relocations for these operations. The industry viewpoint won the day, and regulators' final white paper steered clear of including a recommended minimum distance between data centers.
In a perfect world, the issue would never come up again. In the real world, efforts to disaster-proof the American financial system are likely to be revisited often going forward. As mirroring technology improves, a key argument in favor of the status quo becomes less persuasive.
There is not an accepted industry best practice for geographical distance for disaster recovery hot sites. This may have to due with the fact that different locations face different risks from terror, weather (tornadoes, earthquakes, ice storms, etc.) flooding, et al.
In practice, every firm must make the decision themselves given their location risks, regulatory requirements, and the demands of management and shareholders for business continuity goals.
Duly stated, the current telecomm costs and availability limit the distance where disk/data mirroring over bandwidth is feasible.
However, Regional Data Centers in second tier cities often provide a valued solution where the DR hotsite is reasonably close in proximity to support affordable disk mirroring over bandwidth, yet geographically diverse enough to mitigate the risks of concern.
I have experienced fortune 500 firms who have moved from premier DR providers in Tier 1 cities, such as AT&T, MCI, IBM, and Sungard, to a Regional Data Center in a location closer to their primary data center, to solve the disk mirroring problem.
Posted by: Philip Thornberg at November 6, 2003 10:57 AM