Connecting
With the Bottom Line
Network management growing in importance as cost management tool
May 30, 2002 -- Network interconnections will be crucial
cost management tools for service providers, according to operators
of Internet exchange points, who see a bright future for peering
services.
But
can that future get here fast enough? Share prices of interconnection
providers are languishing below $1 a share, and others are in
bankruptcy.
Executives
of Internet exchange points say that economic pressures will compel
more Internet service providers to seek tighter control over their
networks.
"Netflow
analysis and traffic relationships are going to become more important
to the folks in the green eyeshades," said Tim Guarnieri,
general manager of PAIX.net. "I think that pressure will
be seen in the next 12 to 18 months."
Despite
peering's potential to reduce bandwidth costs, only one out of
20 ISPs currently conduct in-depth analysis of their traffic patterns,
according to William Norton, co-founder and chief technical liaison
at Equinix Inc., which offers interconnections through its Internet
Business Exchange (IBX) data centers.
Norton
just completed a two-year research project examining ISP peering
practices, and said changing user practices may persuade more
providers to beef up their traffic monitoring.
Among
them are the growth of Internet file sharing. Norton said several
providers were seeing peer-to-peer file-sharing services like
Kazaa and Morpheus account for up to 40 percent of their traffic.
"This
is a fundamentally new use of the Internet that is costing these
guys a lot of money," said Norton.
Interconnection
providers are feeling financial pressure as well, getting beat
up
along with the rest of the telecom industry.
Early
this year, shares of Equinix and Universal Access were showing
resiliency, trading at $3.50 and $6 a share respectively. This
week both are trading below 40 cents a share.
MFN,
the parent of PAIX.net, announced its intention to sell PAIX.net
for about $50 million, but it's not clear if MFN completed the
deal before its May 20 Chapter 11 filing.
Things
are worse for "pooling point" operators. Lightrade,
which operated seven interconnection facilities, filed for Chapter
7 bankruptcy in March. Another significant pooling point operator
was Enron Broadband Services, which shuttered its network after
its scandal-plagued parent filed bankruptcy in December.
"It's
challenging," said Bob Fischer, Bob Fischer, director of
industry intelligence for Universal Access. "The next year's
going to be a tightrope act."
But
Fischer agreed that the changed environment should help companies
that can help providers squeeze more dollars out of their existing
networks. That bottom-line approach is reflected in his discussions
with industry executives.
"What
we're dealing with now is businessmen as opposed to visionaries,"
said Fischer. "The business people are working with a spreadsheet
instead of a PowerPoint presentation."
"Exchange
points are crucial to the growth and quality of the Internet,"
said Guarnieri of PAIX.net. "You're going to see exchange
points springing up wherever you have large concentrations of
providers."
The
focus on interconnectivity has many carrier hotel owners beefing
up their meet-me rooms. FiberNet recently completed a new meet-me
room at 60 Hudson Street in New York, while Carlyle Realty Group
is upgrading the meet-me rooms in its carrier hotels at One Wilshire
in Los Angeles and Market Post Tower in San Jose.
Developing
peering relationships can be a delicate process, Norton said,
and one which ISPs must master if they hope to peer with multiple
providers.
"Peering
is like a singles dance," said Norton. "If you make
an ass out of yourself in the first hour, no one wants to dance
with you the rest of the night."
|