Feds
Release Wall Street White Paper
Regulators seek middle ground on distance between disaster recovery
sites
April 14, 2003 -- Federal regulators have released their
final white
paper on disaster recovery for the financial sector, urging
improvements in data center redundancy, but stopping short of
any specific guidelines regarding backup facilities.
The document
reinforces the need for "out of area" data centers, but acknowledges
industry concerns about disruptive mandates, such as a minimum
distance between primary and secondary data centers.
The findings,
which were expected, backed away from more aggressive proposals
in an earlier version of the document.
In recent
months, numerous large financial firms have begun seeking additional
data center space outside Manhattan and its immediate suburbs.
The Depository Trust Corporation and MasterCard have bought data
centers, while the Bank of New York just leased a former WorldCom
facility in Somerset, NJ.
In its
initial
form issued last fall, the white paper - prompted by the Sept.
11 attacks and developed jointly by the Federal Reserve, Treasury
Department and SEC - established a goal of same-day recovery for
Wall Street and the banking sector.
It also
suggested that some key financial firms' disaster recovery plans
were inadequate to address a large-scale regional disaster.
"All core clearing and settlement organizations should begin to
implement plans to establish out-of-region back-up resources within
the next year," the agencies state. "The objective is to minimize
the risk that a primary and backup site, and their respective
labor pools, could both be impaired by a single wide-scale regional
disruption."
Those
concerns were supported by a February
GAO report which found that at least four major Wall Street
firms maintain no backup data centers for disaster recovery, while
six other firms' facilities are located within 10 miles of their
primary site.
Wall
Street industry groups objected to the initial white paper, saying
business continuity programs should be guided by current best
practices, rather than specific criteria such as a minimum distance
between data centers. They also noted that current real-time mirroring
technology also places limits on the distance between the primary
and secondary data centers, usually no more than 60 miles.
The revised
paper "provides more flexibility to firms in managing geographic
diversity of back-up facilities, staffing arrangements, and cost-benefit
considerations," the agencies noted.
"The agencies do not believe it is necessary or appropriate to
prescribe specific mileage requirements for geographically dispersed
back-up sites, the paper noted. "Firms may consider the costs
and benefits of a variety of approaches that ensure rapid recovery
from a wide-scale disruption."
The agencies made it clear that "core clearing and settlement
organizations " bore a responsibility to meet the highest
standards for business continuity. "Accordingly, these organizations
should establish back-up facilities a significant distance away
from their primary sites," the paper stated.
While concerns about disaster recovery have boosted activity in
the US data center market, some Wall Street firms appear to be
looking abroad to outsource their backup facilities.
"A few commenters indicate that they are exploring overseas
locations as part of their recovery and resumption solutions and
ask for some assurances that domestic and foreign financial authorities
will permit such arrangements," the white paper said.
The final form of the white paper was welcomed by Wall Street
trade groups.
"The paper's business continuity objectives, sound practices and
timetables will clearly improve the resilience of the U.S. financial
markets," said Donald Kittell, Executive Vice President of the
Securities Industry Association.
"We appreciate the agencies' responsiveness to those comments,
the intelligent process the agencies used to follow through and
understand the views of market participants, and the constructive
balance between meaningful objectives and flexibility of approach
reflected in the final paper," Kittell added.
|